RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

0xKoda/WireMCP

Default branch main · commit 7f45f8b2 · scanned 6/16/2026, 2:38:12 PM

GitHub: 507 stars · 58 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 0xKoda/WireMCP, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify "Wireshark" connection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # WireMCP
WireMCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to empower Large Language Models (LLMs) with real-time network traffic analysis capabilities.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # WireMCP: Wireshark Model Context Protocol (MCP)
WireMCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built on Wireshark's tshark, designed to empower Large Language Models (LLMs) with real-time network traffic analysis capabilities.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Your project's dedicated website or documentation URL, or the GitHub repo URL if no other exists]
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics for better specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    llm, mcp, network-analysis, wireshark
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, mcp, wireshark, tshark, network-traffic-analysis, real-time-network-monitoring, threat-hunting, network-diagnostics, anomaly-detection

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 0xKoda/WireMCP
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Apache Kafka
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Apache Kafka · recommended 1×
  2. Apache Flink · recommended 1×
  3. Apache Spark Streaming · recommended 1×
  4. Redis · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to give large language models real-time access to network traffic data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Kafka
    2. Apache Flink
    3. Apache Spark Streaming
    4. Redis
    5. LangChain
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. Prometheus

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 0xKoda/WireMCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for AI-driven real-time network threat detection and anomaly analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Darktrace
    2. Vectra AI (Cognito Detect)
    3. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360
    4. Exabeam Fusion SIEM
    5. IBM QRadar Network Insights

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named 0xKoda/WireMCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 0xKoda/WireMCP?
    pass
    AI named 0xKoda/WireMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 0xKoda/WireMCP in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 0xKoda/WireMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 0xKoda/WireMCP solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 0xKoda/WireMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 0xKoda/WireMCP. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/0xKoda/WireMCP.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/0xKoda/WireMCP)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/0xKoda/WireMCP"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/0xKoda/WireMCP.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

0xKoda/WireMCP — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite