RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

BuilderIO/skills

Default branch main · commit a0726717 · scanned 6/18/2026, 3:17:57 PM

GitHub: 1,159 stars · 59 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface BuilderIO/skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify visual agent planning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Small, composable skills for coding agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Small, composable skills for coding agents, specifically designed to make AI agent plans and recaps visual, interactive, and human-reviewable.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    skills, ai-agents, llm-skills, agent-skills, visual-planning, ai-development, coding-agents, agent-native, ai-tools
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine repository description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Skills for coding agents
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Small, composable skills for coding agents, designed to enhance agent capabilities without being a full framework. Includes visual planning and recap tools.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface BuilderIO/skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Miro
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Miro · recommended 1×
  2. Lucidchart · recommended 1×
  3. jgraph/drawio · recommended 1×
  4. Whimsical · recommended 1×
  5. FigJam · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make AI agent development plans more visual and easier for humans to review?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Miro
    2. Lucidchart
    3. draw.io (jgraph/drawio)
    4. Whimsical
    5. FigJam
    6. PlantUML (plantuml/plantuml)
    7. Microsoft Visio

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named BuilderIO/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good libraries for adding specific, composable skills to my AI coding assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. OpenAI Functions
    5. Instructor
    6. Pydantic

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named BuilderIO/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of BuilderIO/skills?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts BuilderIO/skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo BuilderIO/skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of BuilderIO/skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

BuilderIO/skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite