RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills

Default branch master · commit 500b0c00 · scanned 5/8/2026, 2:42:50 AM

GitHub: 7,469 stars · 488 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's opening to emphasize it's an 'awesome list' or 'directory' of skills

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A curated list of practical Codex skills for automating workflows across the Codex CLI and API.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is an **awesome list and directory** of practical Codex skills, designed to help you automate workflows across the Codex CLI and API. Unlike platforms that provide integrations, this is a curated collection of ready-to-use skill definitions for your Codex agent.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://composio.dev

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.0-flash-001, deepseek/deepseek-chat

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.0-flash-001. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Zapier
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Zapier · recommended 1×
  2. IFTTT · recommended 1×
  3. Microsoft Power Automate · recommended 1×
  4. Integromat · recommended 1×
  5. n8n · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need to expand my AI assistant's capabilities for complex workflow automation; where to find skills?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zapier
    2. IFTTT
    3. Microsoft Power Automate
    4. Integromat
    5. n8n
    6. Workato
    7. Tray.io

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a library of pre-made agent actions to integrate with my LLM for task execution.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. CrewAI
    3. AutoGen
    4. Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. Meltwater/autotools

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite