RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fmaclen/hollama

Default branch main · commit 78c63850 · scanned 5/22/2026, 2:37:07 PM

GitHub: 1,148 stars · 87 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fmaclen/hollama, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Hollama's role as a client-side browser app in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A minimal LLM chat app that runs _entirely_ in your browser.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A minimal, **client-side** LLM chat app that runs _entirely_ in your browser. Hollama connects to existing Ollama or OpenAI servers, providing a rich UI for interaction, not serving models itself.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for browser-based client applications

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, chatbot, llm, local-ai, ollama
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, chatbot, llm, local-ai, ollama, web-app, browser-app, client-side, frontend
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Hollama?' section comparing it to alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Hollama? 
    
    [Add a brief comparison here, highlighting what makes Hollama unique compared to alternatives like LM Studio, Jan, or Ollama Web UI, focusing on its browser-based nature and multi-server support.]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fmaclen/hollama
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LM Studio
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LM Studio · recommended 2×
  2. Ollama · recommended 2×
  3. Jan · recommended 2×
  4. LocalAI · recommended 2×
  5. Ollama Web UI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good browser-based chat interfaces for interacting with local large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama
    3. Ollama Web UI
    4. Jan
    5. Text Generation WebUI (oobabooga/text-generation-webui)
    6. LocalAI
    7. Chatbot UI
    8. KoboldCpp

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named fmaclen/hollama. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a desktop application to chat with various AI models offline with advanced features.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama
    3. Jan
    4. LocalAI
    5. GPT4All
    6. KoboldAI Lite
    7. KoboldAI United

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named fmaclen/hollama. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fmaclen/hollama?
    pass
    AI named fmaclen/hollama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fmaclen/hollama in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fmaclen/hollama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fmaclen/hollama solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named fmaclen/hollama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fmaclen/hollama. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fmaclen/hollama.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fmaclen/hollama)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fmaclen/hollama"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fmaclen/hollama.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fmaclen/hollama — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite