RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping

Default branch main · commit d527698c · scanned 6/6/2026, 3:28:30 PM

GitHub: 914 stars · 168 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening value proposition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    As we can see a lot of companies today decide to go with a multi-cloud strategy. Here is the overview where all major services between AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI are mapped with links pointing to product home pages.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a comprehensive, human-curated mapping of major services across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI, with direct links to each product's homepage. It's an essential reference for cloud architects, engineers, and decision-makers navigating multi-cloud strategies and understanding service equivalencies.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a standard open-source LICENSE file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MIT License
    
    Copyright (c) [YEAR] [FULL NAME]
    
    Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
    of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
    in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
    to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
    copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
    furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
    
    The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
    copies or substantial portions of the Software.
    
    THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
    IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
    FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
    AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
    LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
    OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
    SOFTWARE.
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why this mapping?' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why this Cloud Product Mapping?
    
    While vendor documentation and broad cloud landscapes exist, this repository offers a unique, human-curated, and open-source perspective. It provides:
    
    *   **Direct Equivalencies:** Quickly find the corresponding service across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI.
    *   **Up-to-date Links:** Each service links directly to its official product homepage for the latest information.
    *   **Multi-Cloud Focus:** Designed specifically for architects and engineers working in multi-cloud environments.
    *   **Community-Driven:** An open-source resource that benefits from community contributions and verification, unlike proprietary reports or vendor-locked guides.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Gartner Magic Quadrant
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Gartner Magic Quadrant · recommended 2×
  2. Forrester Wave Reports · recommended 2×
  3. Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Cloud Native Interactive Landscape · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud's "Cloud Comparison" Documentation · recommended 1×
  5. AWS "Cloud Comparison" Documentation · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need to understand service equivalencies across major public cloud platforms for multi-cloud strategy.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Cloud Native Interactive Landscape
    2. Google Cloud's "Cloud Comparison" Documentation
    3. AWS "Cloud Comparison" Documentation
    4. Azure "Cloud Comparison" Documentation
    5. CloudZero's Cloud Service Comparison Guides
    6. RightScale's "State of the Cloud Report"
    7. Gartner Magic Quadrant
    8. Forrester Wave Reports

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a quick reference to map cloud services between different providers for architecture planning.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CloudMapper (duosecurity/cloudmapper)
    2. AWS Cloud for Azure Professionals
    3. Azure for AWS Professionals
    4. Google Cloud for AWS Professionals
    5. CNCF Interactive Map
    6. CloudZero
    7. ParkMyCloud
    8. Gartner Magic Quadrant
    9. Forrester Wave Reports

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping?
    pass
    AI did not name milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

milanm/Cloud-Product-Mapping — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite