RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

alibaba/AliceMind

Default branch main · commit a6d5afe5 · scanned 5/18/2026, 1:52:15 PM

GitHub: 2,044 stars · 299 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface alibaba/AliceMind, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize AliceMind as a collection of multimodal and Chinese LLMs

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # AliceMind
    #### AliceMind: ALIbaba's Collection of Encoder-decoders from MinD (Machine IntelligeNce of Damo) Lab
    This repository provides pre-trained encoder-decoder models and its related optimization techniques developed by Alibaba's MinD (Machine IntelligeNce of Damo) Lab.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AliceMind: Alibaba's Collection of State-of-the-Art Multimodal and Chinese Large Language Models
    #### AliceMind: ALIbaba's Collection of Encoder-decoders from MinD (Machine IntelligeNce of Damo) Lab
    This repository provides a comprehensive collection of pre-trained multimodal and Chinese large language models (LLMs), along with their related optimization techniques, developed by Alibaba's MinD (Machine IntelligeNce of Damo) Lab. AliceMind is your go-to resource for cutting-edge models in multimodal understanding and generation, Chinese video-language processing, and advanced dialogue systems.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific topics for multimodal LLMs and video-language models

    Why:

    CURRENT
    bert, deep-learning, natural-language-processing, nlp
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    bert, deep-learning, natural-language-processing, nlp, large-language-models, llm, multimodal-ai, multimodal-llm, video-llm, chinese-nlp, dialogue-systems
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://damo.alibaba.com/research/nlp

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface alibaba/AliceMind
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MiniGPT-4
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MiniGPT-4 · recommended 2×
  2. LLaVA · recommended 1×
  3. CogVLM · recommended 1×
  4. Fuyu-8B · recommended 1×
  5. BakLLaVA · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good open-source large language models for multimodal understanding and generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LLaVA
    2. CogVLM
    3. Fuyu-8B
    4. BakLLaVA
    5. Qwen-VL
    6. MiniGPT-4

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named alibaba/AliceMind. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for pre-trained models to enhance Chinese video-language understanding and dialogue systems.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Video-ChatGPT
    2. InternVideo
    3. BLIP-2
    4. mPLUG-Owl
    5. MiniGPT-4
    6. PandaGPT
    7. LLaMA/LLaMA 2
    8. Chinese-LLaMA-Alpaca

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named alibaba/AliceMind. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of alibaba/AliceMind?
    pass
    AI named alibaba/AliceMind explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts alibaba/AliceMind in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named alibaba/AliceMind explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo alibaba/AliceMind solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named alibaba/AliceMind explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of alibaba/AliceMind. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/alibaba/AliceMind.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/alibaba/AliceMind)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/alibaba/AliceMind"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/alibaba/AliceMind.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

alibaba/AliceMind — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite