RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xincmm/sageread

Default branch main · commit 8b75aff7 · scanned 6/3/2026, 12:22:15 AM

GitHub: 742 stars · 78 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xincmm/sageread, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear English positioning statement to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    SageRead 是一款电子书阅读器，主要特点是可以在阅读时随时跟 AI 对话。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    SageRead is an AI-powered e-book reader designed for deep reading, integrating real-time AI conversation, comprehensive note-taking, and reading analytics. It allows you to interact with your books and AI simultaneously, with all data stored locally and support for self-configured AI models.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    e-book-reader, ai-assistant, reading-app, epub, local-data, privacy-focused, deep-reading, knowledge-management
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Your project's official website or demo URL, e.g., https://sageread.app]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xincmm/sageread
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
reMarkable 2
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. reMarkable 2 · recommended 1×
  2. Onyx Boox Devices · recommended 1×
  3. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  4. Google Bard · recommended 1×
  5. Kobo Libra Colour · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What e-book readers integrate AI for real-time contextual questioning and content summarization?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. reMarkable 2
    2. Onyx Boox Devices
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Google Bard
    5. Kobo Libra Colour
    6. Kobo Sage
    7. Amazon Kindle Scribe
    8. iPad
    9. Android Tablets
    10. Apple Books
    11. Google Play Books
    12. Perplexity AI
    13. Instapaper
    14. Readwise Reader

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named xincmm/sageread. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there e-reading applications that support local data storage and self-configurable AI models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Calibre
    2. Koreader
    3. Moon+ Reader Pro
    4. FBReader
    5. BookFusion

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named xincmm/sageread. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xincmm/sageread?
    pass
    AI did not name xincmm/sageread — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xincmm/sageread in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xincmm/sageread explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xincmm/sageread solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named xincmm/sageread explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xincmm/sageread. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xincmm/sageread.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xincmm/sageread)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xincmm/sageread"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xincmm/sageread.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xincmm/sageread — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
xincmm/sageread — RepoGEO report