RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

moazbuilds/claudeclaw

Default branch master · commit ef755dfb · scanned 5/18/2026, 8:08:09 PM

GitHub: 1,111 stars · 199 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface moazbuilds/claudeclaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-assistant, claude-ai, llm-agent, automation, daemon, task-scheduler, chat-bot, personal-assistant
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's main title to clearly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"><b>A lightweight, open-source OpenClaw version built into your Claude Code.</b></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"><b>ClaudeClaw: Your Lightweight AI Assistant Daemon for Claude Code</b></p>
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/moazbuilds/claudeclaw

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface moazbuilds/claudeclaw
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
FastAPI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. FastAPI · recommended 1×
  2. Celery · recommended 1×
  3. RQ · recommended 1×
  4. Flask · recommended 1×
  5. APScheduler · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a lightweight daemon to run AI-powered scheduled tasks and respond to chat.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FastAPI
    2. Celery
    3. RQ
    4. Flask
    5. APScheduler
    6. Node.js
    7. Express.js
    8. Agenda.js
    9. BullMQ
    10. Go
    11. Goroutines
    12. github.com/robfig/cron (robfig/cron)
    13. RabbitMQ
    14. Redis
    15. Python
    16. Asyncio

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named moazbuilds/claudeclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a custom AI assistant for voice commands and messaging platform integration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rasa Open Source (RasaHQ/rasa)
    2. Google Dialogflow CX
    3. Google Dialogflow ES
    4. Microsoft Bot Framework Composer (microsoft/BotFramework-Composer)
    5. Azure Cognitive Services
    6. LUIS
    7. Amazon Lex
    8. Amazon Transcribe
    9. Amazon Polly
    10. AWS Lambda
    11. OpenAI API
    12. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    13. GPT-4
    14. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    15. Azure Speech-to-Text
    16. AssemblyAI
    17. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    18. Azure Text-to-Speech
    19. ElevenLabs
    20. python-telegram-bot (python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot)
    21. discord.py (Rapptz/discord.py)
    22. Snips (snipsco/snips-nlu)
    23. Mycroft AI (MycroftAI/mycroft-core)

    AI recommended 23 alternatives but never named moazbuilds/claudeclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of moazbuilds/claudeclaw?
    pass
    AI did not name moazbuilds/claudeclaw — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts moazbuilds/claudeclaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named moazbuilds/claudeclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo moazbuilds/claudeclaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named moazbuilds/claudeclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of moazbuilds/claudeclaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/moazbuilds/claudeclaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/moazbuilds/claudeclaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/moazbuilds/claudeclaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/moazbuilds/claudeclaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

moazbuilds/claudeclaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite