RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold

Default branch main · commit ab34017d · scanned 5/20/2026, 9:02:49 AM

GitHub: 1,006 stars · 169 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    phishing-detection, social-media-security, llm, llama, machine-learning, cybersecurity, research-framework, graph-neural-networks, adversarial-robustness
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file and state it in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a `LICENSE` file (e.g., `LICENSE.md` with the MIT License text) to the repository root. Then, add a line to your README, for example: `This project is released under the MIT License.`
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify README's opening to emphasize 'open-source research framework'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **A unified framework for phishing detection and propagation control on social media, powered by LLaMA and advanced graph-based intervention strategies.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **PhishGuard is an open-source research framework for joint semantic detection and propagation control of phishing attacks on social media, powered by LLaMA and advanced graph-based intervention strategies.**

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) · recommended 1×
  2. CSC Digital Brand Services · recommended 1×
  3. MarkMonitor · recommended 1×
  4. ZeroFOX AI-Powered Protection · recommended 1×
  5. PhishLabs Digital Risk Protection · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust frameworks for detecting and controlling phishing attacks on social media platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    2. CSC Digital Brand Services
    3. MarkMonitor
    4. ZeroFOX AI-Powered Protection
    5. PhishLabs Digital Risk Protection
    6. Twitter Safety
    7. Facebook Security
    8. Maltego
    9. Shodan
    10. KnowBe4
    11. Cofense

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to leverage advanced AI models for semantic analysis in social media security applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. Google Cloud Natural Language API
    3. OpenAI API
    4. spaCy
    5. Amazon Comprehend
    6. Flair
    7. Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services for Language

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold?
    pass
    AI named wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wang-rui/phishguard-scaffold — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite