RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mljar/mljar-supervised

Default branch master · commit 1603bf63 · scanned 6/30/2026, 9:37:01 AM

GitHub: 3,272 stars · 447 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mljar/mljar-supervised, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify core offering and differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # MLJAR Automated Machine Learning for Humans
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # MLJAR Supervised: Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) for Tabular Data in Python
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
    - **Automated Machine Learning for Tabular Data**: Streamline model building, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning.
    - **Built-in Explanations**: Understand model decisions with automatic explanations.
    - **Automatic Documentation**: Generate comprehensive reports for your ML pipelines.
    - **Web App Generation**: Easily deploy trained models as web applications.
    - **Fairness Aware Training**: Incorporate fairness considerations into your models.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives
    MLJAR Supervised stands out by offering a comprehensive AutoML solution for tabular data with a strong focus on **transparency, explainability, and automatic documentation**. While tools like AutoGluon and H2O.ai AutoML provide robust model building, MLJAR Supervised prioritizes generating human-readable insights and deployable web applications directly from your trained models, making it ideal for data scientists who need to explain and operationalize their work quickly.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mljar/mljar-supervised
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
H2O.ai AutoML
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. H2O.ai AutoML · recommended 2×
  2. AutoGluon · recommended 2×
  3. TPOT · recommended 2×
  4. PyCaret · recommended 2×
  5. Featuretools · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly build machine learning models for tabular datasets with automated feature engineering?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. H2O.ai AutoML
    2. AutoGluon
    3. TPOT
    4. Featuretools
    5. Google Cloud AutoML Tables
    6. DataRobot
    7. PyCaret

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mljar/mljar-supervised. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Python library to automate ML model creation with built-in explanations and documentation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGluon
    2. TPOT
    3. H2O.ai AutoML
    4. PyCaret
    5. MLBox

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mljar/mljar-supervised. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mljar/mljar-supervised?
    pass
    AI did not name mljar/mljar-supervised — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mljar/mljar-supervised in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mljar/mljar-supervised explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mljar/mljar-supervised solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mljar/mljar-supervised explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mljar/mljar-supervised. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mljar/mljar-supervised.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mljar/mljar-supervised)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mljar/mljar-supervised"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mljar/mljar-supervised.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mljar/mljar-supervised — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite