RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hkust-nlp/ceval

Default branch main · commit cba65ae9 · scanned 5/27/2026, 9:32:33 PM

GitHub: 1,851 stars · 83 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hkust-nlp/ceval, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening to assert official status and unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    C-Eval is a comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite for foundation models. It consists of 13948 multi-choice questions spanning 52 diverse disciplines and four difficulty levels, as shown below. Please visit our website or check our paper for more details.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    C-Eval is the **official and most comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite** for foundation models. As presented at NeurIPS 2023, it features 13948 multi-choice questions across 52 diverse disciplines and four difficulty levels, serving as the primary benchmark for Chinese LLMs. Visit our website or check our paper for more details.
  • lowreadme#2
    Expand "Why C-Eval?" section to explicitly state differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    📝 Why C-Eval? How did we build it? (in Chinese)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why C-Eval? (Core Differentiators)
    
    C-Eval stands out as the leading benchmark for Chinese LLMs due to its:
    - **Comprehensiveness:** 13948 questions across 52 disciplines.
    - **Multi-level Difficulty:** Four distinct difficulty levels for nuanced evaluation.
    - **Official Status:** The primary reference for Chinese foundation model evaluation, accepted at NeurIPS 2023.
    - **Community Integration:** Widely adopted and integrated into evaluation harnesses like lm-evaluation-harness.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hkust-nlp/ceval
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
C-Eval
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. C-Eval · recommended 2×
  2. GAOKAO-Bench · recommended 2×
  3. CMMLU (Chinese Massive Multitask Language Understanding) · recommended 1×
  4. CLUE (Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation) Benchmark · recommended 1×
  5. LongBench · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I benchmark large language models specifically for Chinese language understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. C-Eval
    2. CMMLU (Chinese Massive Multitask Language Understanding)
    3. GAOKAO-Bench
    4. CLUE (Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation) Benchmark
    5. LongBench
    6. Xiezhi (獇貈)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named hkust-nlp/ceval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary benchmark for evaluating Chinese large language models.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. C-Eval
    2. CMMLU
    3. GAOKAO-Bench
    4. AGIEval
    5. CLUE
    6. Xiezhi

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named hkust-nlp/ceval. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hkust-nlp/ceval?
    pass
    AI did not name hkust-nlp/ceval — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hkust-nlp/ceval in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hkust-nlp/ceval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hkust-nlp/ceval solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hkust-nlp/ceval explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hkust-nlp/ceval. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hkust-nlp/ceval.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hkust-nlp/ceval)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hkust-nlp/ceval"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hkust-nlp/ceval.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hkust-nlp/ceval — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite