RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT

Default branch main · commit bd46c44e · scanned 5/21/2026, 3:33:10 AM

GitHub: 2,796 stars · 251 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize "unified platform" and "tabular intelligence"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This is the repository for the `Alpaca-CoT` project, which aims to build an instruction finetuning (IFT) platform with extensive instruction collection (especially the CoT datasets) and a unified interface for various large language models and parameter-efficient methods.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Alpaca-CoT is a comprehensive instruction finetuning (IFT) platform offering a unified interface for diverse large language models, parameter-efficient methods, and extensive instruction collections, including Chain-of-Thought (CoT) datasets. It also features a dedicated branch for building Tabular LLMs to solve Table Intelligence Tasks.
  • hightopics#2
    Add "instruction-tuning-platform" topic

    Why:

    CURRENT
    alpaca, chatglm, chatgpt, cot, instruction-tuning, llama, llm, lora, moss, p-tuning, parameter-efficient, pytorch, tabul, tabular-data, tabular-model
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    alpaca, chatglm, chatgpt, cot, instruction-tuning, instruction-tuning-platform, llama, llm, lora, moss, p-tuning, parameter-efficient, pytorch, tabul, tabular-data, tabular-model
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://huggingface.co/QingyiSi/Alpaca-CoT

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hugging Face Transformers
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  3. PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning) Library · recommended 1×
  4. Ludwig · recommended 1×
  5. DeepSpeed · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a unified platform for instruction tuning large language models with various efficient methods.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning) Library
    3. Ludwig
    4. OpenAI API
    5. DeepSpeed
    6. LitGPT
    7. Axolotl

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a robust framework to perform instruction tuning on language models for tabular intelligence.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. LoRA
    3. QLoRA
    4. Ludwig (ludwig-ai/ludwig)
    5. OpenAI API
    6. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    7. GPT-4
    8. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    9. PyTorch Lightning

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT?
    pass
    AI did not name PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

PhoebusSi/Alpaca-CoT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite