RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV

Default branch main · commit c9ba98a3 · scanned 6/17/2026, 4:17:11 PM

GitHub: 1,116 stars · 49 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a disambiguation statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OpenScholarXIV

OpenScholarXIV is a free and open-source app for finding, reading, bookmarking, summarizing, and discussing arXiv papers with AI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OpenScholarXIV

OpenScholarXIV is a free and open-source app for finding, reading, bookmarking, summarizing, and discussing arXiv papers with AI. It is designed for academic research, specifically for papers from the arXiv repository, and is not affiliated with or related to the game Final Fantasy XIV.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    arxiv, academic-research, ai-assistant, paper-summarization, mobile-app, android, research-tool, gpt, gemini-api
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV/releases

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Perplexity AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Perplexity AI · recommended 2×
  2. Elicit · recommended 1×
  3. SciSpace · recommended 1×
  4. ChatPDF · recommended 1×
  5. Humata AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    AI tool to summarize and chat with arXiv academic papers for better understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. SciSpace
    3. ChatPDF
    4. Humata AI
    5. Perplexity AI
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good mobile apps for reading, bookmarking, and summarizing academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ReadCube Papers
    2. Mendeley
    3. Zotero
    4. LiquidText
    5. PDF Expert
    6. Perplexity AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV?
    pass
    AI named dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

dagmawibabi/ScholarXIV — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite