RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Osilly/Vision-R1

Default branch main · commit e33b95d6 · scanned 5/26/2026, 12:19:38 PM

GitHub: 1,144 stars · 26 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Osilly/Vision-R1, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    multimodal-llm, mllm, reasoning, reinforcement-learning, rl, large-language-models, vision-language-models, ai-models, deep-learning, iclr2026
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Vision-R1
    
    The official repo for "Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models".
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with Reinforcement Learning
    
    Vision-R1 is the official repository for our ICLR 2026 paper, introducing a novel reasoning MLLM that leverages cold-start initialization and RL training to significantly enhance reasoning capabilities. This project provides models, datasets, and code for researchers and developers focused on advanced multimodal AI reasoning.
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0) in the root of the repository, or explicitly state the chosen license(s) in the README if a custom license is intended.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Osilly/Vision-R1
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
huggingface/transformers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  2. huggingface/trl · recommended 1×
  3. deepmind/acme · recommended 1×
  4. openai/triton · recommended 1×
  5. openai/clip · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to improve reasoning capabilities in multimodal large language models using reinforcement learning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    2. TRL (Transformer Reinforcement Learning) (huggingface/trl)
    3. DeepMind's Acme (deepmind/acme)
    4. OpenAI's Triton (openai/triton)
    5. OpenAI's CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training) (openai/clip)
    6. Google's PaLI/PaLM-E
    7. Meta's DINOv2 (Self-supervised Vision Transformer) (facebookresearch/dinov2)
    8. Meta's Habitat (facebookresearch/habitat-lab)
    9. Microsoft's AirSim (microsoft/airsim)
    10. BabyAI (mila-iqia/babyai)
    11. OpenAI Gym/Farama Foundation Gymnasium (Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium)
    12. Google's Dopamine (google/dopamine)
    13. DeepMind's Reverb (deepmind/reverb)

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named Osilly/Vision-R1. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective training methods for enhancing reasoning in multimodal AI models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CLIP
    2. ALIGN
    3. VQA
    4. GQA
    5. NLVR2
    6. Flamingo
    7. GPT-4V
    8. Data2vec

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Osilly/Vision-R1. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Osilly/Vision-R1?
    pass
    AI named Osilly/Vision-R1 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Osilly/Vision-R1 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Osilly/Vision-R1 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Osilly/Vision-R1 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Osilly/Vision-R1 — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Osilly/Vision-R1. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Osilly/Vision-R1.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Osilly/Vision-R1)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Osilly/Vision-R1"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Osilly/Vision-R1.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Osilly/Vision-R1 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite