RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

0xKarl-dev/claw-codes

Default branch main · commit 00329254 · scanned 6/10/2026, 2:27:20 PM

GitHub: 505 stars · 572 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state the project's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## 🧱 Rewriting Project Claw Code

<p align="center">
  <strong> Better harness tools, focused on execution not merely storing the archive of leaked Claude Code </strong>
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 🧱 Claw Codes: Powerful AI Agent Tooling for Leaked Claude Code

<p align="center">
  <strong> This project, currently being rewritten in Rust, provides tools focused on harnessing and executing leaked Claude Code, recognized for innovation in AI agent tooling. </strong>
</p>
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License (or another suitable open-source license).
  • mediumtopics#3
    Update repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    automation, cli, developper-tools, productivity, rust
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, claude-ai, developer-tools, rust, cli, automation, generative-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ripgrep
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ripgrep · recommended 1×
  2. fd · recommended 1×
  3. bat · recommended 1×
  4. zoxide · recommended 1×
  5. procs · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some powerful command-line interface tools for automation written in Rust?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ripgrep
    2. fd
    3. bat
    4. zoxide
    5. procs
    6. xh
    7. tealdeer

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for developer productivity tools focused on execution rather than just archiving.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jira Software
    2. GitHub Projects
    3. GitLab Issues
    4. Asana
    5. ClickUp
    6. Linear
    7. Trello

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes?
    pass
    AI named 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 0xKarl-dev/claw-codes. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/0xKarl-dev/claw-codes.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/0xKarl-dev/claw-codes)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/0xKarl-dev/claw-codes"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/0xKarl-dev/claw-codes.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

0xKarl-dev/claw-codes — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite