RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality

Default branch main · commit b1af04ea · scanned 6/26/2026, 8:53:09 PM

GitHub: 1,240 stars · 103 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify its nature as a research resource

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This is a repository for organizing articles related to Domain generalization, OOD, optimization, data-centric learning, prompt learning, robutness, and causality. Most papers are linked to **my reading notes**.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository serves as a curated collection of my personal reading notes and organized articles on key research topics including Domain Generalization, Out-of-Distribution (OOD) learning, Causality, Robustness, Prompt Learning, Optimization, and Generative Models. It is designed as a resource for researchers to explore and understand the latest advancements in these fields, with most papers linked to detailed notes.
  • highabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://yfzhang114.github.io/
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine topics to include 'literature-review' and 'research-notes'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    adaptation, causality, deep-learning, generative-model, machine-learning, optimization, robustness
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    adaptation, causality, deep-learning, generative-model, machine-learning, optimization, robustness, literature-review, research-notes, survey

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ADDA
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ADDA · recommended 1×
  2. DANN · recommended 1×
  3. CDAN · recommended 1×
  4. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  5. TensorFlow · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to improve deep learning model performance when data distribution shifts between training and testing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ADDA
    2. DANN
    3. CDAN
    4. PyTorch
    5. TensorFlow
    6. Keras
    7. ImageNet
    8. BERT
    9. RoBERTa
    10. Hugging Face Transformers
    11. GPT
    12. Albumentations
    13. imgaug
    14. Keras ImageDataGenerator
    15. CutMix
    16. Mixup
    17. Augly (Facebook AI)
    18. Scikit-learn
    19. VotingClassifier
    20. StackingClassifier
    21. StackingRegressor
    22. Foolbox
    23. Advertorch
    24. Group DRO
    25. FixMatch
    26. UDA
    27. Mean Teacher
    28. Pandas
    29. Canny
    30. GLCM
    31. librosa
    32. OpenCV

    AI recommended 32 alternatives but never named yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking resources to understand causality and robustness for out-of-distribution machine learning models.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms
    2. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer
    3. Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM)
    4. Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks (DANN)
    5. Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO)
    6. PC algorithm
    7. FCI algorithm
    8. Causal-learn (cai-lab/Causal-learn)
    9. NeurIPS Workshop on Causal Inference and Machine Learning
    10. ICML Workshop on Causality in Machine Learning

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality?
    pass
    AI did not name yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yfzhang114/Generalization-Causality — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite