RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yihong0618/tg_bot_collections

Default branch main · commit 1f0c37c3 · scanned 6/16/2026, 7:08:31 AM

GitHub: 576 stars · 112 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yihong0618/tg_bot_collections, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    telegram-bot, ai, llm, image-generation, video-generation, chatgpt, claude, gemini, bot-collection, self-hosted
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README H1 and opening sentence to clarify purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # tg_bot_collections
Collections of yihong0618's telegram bot
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # tg_bot_collections
A curated collection of ready-to-deploy Telegram bots, primarily integrating various AI models for text, image, and video generation, as well as general AI assistance.
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the repository description to highlight AI integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    collections of yihong0618's telegram bot
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A collection of self-hostable Telegram bots, integrating various AI models (LLMs, image/video generation) for diverse functionalities.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yihong0618/tg_bot_collections
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. Telegraf.js · recommended 2×
  3. Python-Telegram-Bot (PTB) · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain.js · recommended 1×
  5. aiogram · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build a Telegram bot that integrates multiple AI language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Python-Telegram-Bot (PTB)
    2. LangChain
    3. Telegraf.js
    4. LangChain.js
    5. aiogram
    6. Node-Telegram-Bot-API
    7. Flask
    8. FastAPI
    9. Go-Telegram-Bot-API

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named yihong0618/tg_bot_collections. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a Telegram bot solution for generating AI images, videos, and text responses.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Python-Telegram-Bot
    2. Hugging Face Transformers
    3. Hugging Face Diffusers
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Stability AI API
    6. Node.js
    7. Telegraf.js
    8. replicate.com
    9. Google Cloud AI Platform
    10. Vertex AI
    11. Botpress
    12. LangChain

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named yihong0618/tg_bot_collections. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yihong0618/tg_bot_collections?
    pass
    AI did not name yihong0618/tg_bot_collections — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yihong0618/tg_bot_collections in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yihong0618/tg_bot_collections explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yihong0618/tg_bot_collections solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name yihong0618/tg_bot_collections — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yihong0618/tg_bot_collections. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yihong0618/tg_bot_collections.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yihong0618/tg_bot_collections)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yihong0618/tg_bot_collections"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yihong0618/tg_bot_collections.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yihong0618/tg_bot_collections — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite