RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

google/mcp-security

Default branch main · commit fb807e90 · scanned 6/15/2026, 10:36:58 PM

GitHub: 502 stars · 120 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface google/mcp-security, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise About description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MCP servers for programmatic access to Google Security Operations (Chronicle, SOAR), Threat Intelligence (GTI), and Security Command Center (SCC) data and services.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify MCP definition and project scope in README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Google Security Operations and Threat Intelligence MCP Server

This repository contains Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that enable MCP clients (like Claude Desktop or the cline.bot VS Code extension) to access Google's security products and services:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Google Security Operations and Threat Intelligence MCP Server (Model Context Protocol)

This repository provides Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, enabling programmatic integration and access to Google's enterprise security products and services for threat detection, investigation, response, and cloud security management. These servers allow MCP clients (like Claude Desktop or the cline.bot VS Code extension) to connect with:

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface google/mcp-security
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) · recommended 1×
  2. IBM Security QRadar SIEM · recommended 1×
  3. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR · recommended 1×
  4. MISP/MISP · recommended 1×
  5. Anomali ThreatStream · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I programmatically integrate and access enterprise threat intelligence and security operations data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
    2. IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    3. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    4. MISP (MISP/MISP)
    5. Anomali ThreatStream
    6. Microsoft Sentinel

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named google/mcp-security. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks exist for developing custom tools to manage cloud security and threat response?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Open Policy Agent (OPA)
    2. Cloud Custodian
    3. Netflix Dispatch
    4. Prowler
    5. Falco
    6. Terrascan
    7. Kube-bench

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named google/mcp-security. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of google/mcp-security?
    pass
    AI named google/mcp-security explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts google/mcp-security in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named google/mcp-security explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo google/mcp-security solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named google/mcp-security explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of google/mcp-security. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/google/mcp-security.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/google/mcp-security)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/google/mcp-security"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/google/mcp-security.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

google/mcp-security — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite