RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

gsd-build/gsd-2

Default branch main · commit 2841a1e4 · scanned 5/12/2026, 4:17:04 PM

GitHub: 7,384 stars · 759 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface gsd-build/gsd-2, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # GSD 2 The evolution of Get Shit Done — now a real coding agent.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # GSD 2: The Autonomous AI Agent for Spec-Driven Software Development
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add AI agent-specific topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    context-engineering, meta-prompting, spec-driven-development
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    context-engineering, meta-prompting, spec-driven-development, ai-agent, autonomous-agent, llm-agent
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/gsd-build/GSD-2

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface gsd-build/gsd-2
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  2. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Copilot Enterprise · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot Workspace · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build an AI agent that manages an entire software development milestone autonomously?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. OpenAI API
    3. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    4. GitHub Copilot Workspace
    5. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    6. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    7. Docker
    8. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    9. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    10. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    11. Jira API
    12. Asana API

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named gsd-build/gsd-2. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for AI agents to maintain context and follow specifications during complex coding tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    4. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. MemGPT (cpacker/MemGPT)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named gsd-build/gsd-2. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of gsd-build/gsd-2?
    pass
    AI named gsd-build/gsd-2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts gsd-build/gsd-2 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named gsd-build/gsd-2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo gsd-build/gsd-2 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named gsd-build/gsd-2 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of gsd-build/gsd-2. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/gsd-build/gsd-2.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/gsd-build/gsd-2)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/gsd-build/gsd-2"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/gsd-build/gsd-2.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

gsd-build/gsd-2 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite