RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader

Default branch main · commit 735c1ba6 · scanned 6/8/2026, 3:42:42 AM

GitHub: 659 stars · 590 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H2 to specify category and deployment model

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ## Your Daily Companion for Discovering and Reading AI Papers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Your Self-Deployable AI-Powered Platform for Daily arXiv/OpenReview Paper Discovery and Reading
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add topics that emphasize 'platform' and 'self-hosted' aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    academic-research, arxiv, arxiv-papers, github-actions, github-pages, literature-review, llm, openreview, paper-recommendation, research-tool
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-research, arxiv, arxiv-papers, github-actions, github-pages, literature-review, llm, openreview, paper-recommendation, research-tool, self-hosted, web-application, ai-platform, research-platform
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a concise differentiator statement to the README introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Unlike commercial services, `daily-paper-reader` offers a fully open-source, self-deployable solution that combines automated paper discovery from arXiv/OpenReview with advanced LLM-powered summarization and Q&A, giving researchers complete control over their data and deployment.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 1×
  2. ResearchRabbit · recommended 1×
  3. Connected Papers · recommended 1×
  4. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  5. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate daily academic paper discovery and use AI for quick understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. ResearchRabbit
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Scite.ai
    6. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    7. DeepDyve

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help deploy a personal arXiv/OpenReview paper review site with AI features?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gradio
    2. Hugging Face Spaces
    3. Streamlit
    4. Google Cloud Run
    5. AWS Fargate
    6. spaCy
    7. NLTK
    8. Transformers
    9. Django
    10. Flask
    11. OpenAI API
    12. Hugging Face Inference API
    13. Heroku
    14. Vercel
    15. Next.js
    16. LangChain
    17. LlamaIndex
    18. Cohere
    19. WordPress
    20. AI Engine
    21. Uncanny Automator

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader?
    pass
    AI did not name ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ziwenhahaha/daily-paper-reader — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite