RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openabdev/openab

Default branch main · commit b8d5a484 · scanned 6/10/2026, 6:07:12 AM

GitHub: 575 stars · 148 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openabdev/openab, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OpenAB — Open Agent Broker
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OpenAB — AI Coding Assistant Integration Harness
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    discord, slack, ai-coding-assistant, cli, integration, rust, cloud-native, json-rpc, developer-tools
  • mediumreadme#3
    Explicitly state the technology stack in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence after the initial description: "Built with **Rust** for performance and security, OpenAB provides a robust foundation for your development workflow."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openabdev/openab
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Discord
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Discord · recommended 2×
  2. Slack · recommended 2×
  3. Zapier · recommended 2×
  4. Make · recommended 2×
  5. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate AI coding assistants with team chat platforms like Discord or Slack?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Discord
    2. Slack
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. GitHub App for Slack
    5. GitHub Bot for Discord (discord-integrations/github-bot)
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Zapier
    8. Make
    9. Tabnine
    10. OpenAI API
    11. slack_sdk (slackapi/python-slack-sdk)
    12. bolt-js (slackapi/bolt-js)
    13. Discord.js (discordjs/discord.js)
    14. Python Discord.py (Rapptz/discord.py)
    15. Hugging Face Inference API
    16. Cody by Sourcegraph
    17. Codeium

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named openabdev/openab. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a cloud-native solution to bridge messaging apps with developer CLIs for collaboration.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Slack
    2. Bolt
    3. Microsoft Teams
    4. Azure Bot Framework
    5. Discord
    6. Discord.js
    7. discord.py
    8. Mattermost
    9. Rocket.Chat
    10. Pipedream
    11. Zapier
    12. Make

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named openabdev/openab. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openabdev/openab?
    pass
    AI did not name openabdev/openab — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openabdev/openab in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openabdev/openab explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openabdev/openab solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openabdev/openab explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openabdev/openab. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openabdev/openab.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openabdev/openab)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openabdev/openab"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openabdev/openab.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openabdev/openab — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite