RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

masamasa59/ai-agent-papers

Default branch main · commit 1a232853 · scanned 6/28/2026, 4:07:46 AM

GitHub: 1,520 stars · 116 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface masamasa59/ai-agent-papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its unique role

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository curates the latest research papers on the applications and architectural technologies of AI agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is a **curated collection of influential research papers** on AI agents, offering a focused alternative to broad search engines or individual research projects.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the 'Homepage' field in the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the 'Homepage' field in the repository's 'About' section to `https://github.com/masamasa59/ai-agent-papers`.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface masamasa59/ai-agent-papers
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
arXiv.org
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. arXiv.org · recommended 1×
  2. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  4. NeurIPS · recommended 1×
  5. ICML · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I discover the latest research papers on autonomous AI agents and their applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv.org
    2. Google Scholar
    3. Semantic Scholar
    4. NeurIPS
    5. ICML
    6. ICLR
    7. AAAI
    8. IJCAI
    9. OpenReview
    10. Papers With Code
    11. Hugging Face
    12. DeepMind
    13. OpenAI
    14. Google AI
    15. Meta AI

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named masamasa59/ai-agent-papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find influential papers discussing planning and reasoning for LLM-powered agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ReAct
    2. Tree of Thoughts
    3. Generative Agents
    4. Self-Refine
    5. Voyager
    6. Plan-and-Execute
    7. MRKL Systems

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named masamasa59/ai-agent-papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of masamasa59/ai-agent-papers?
    pass
    AI did not name masamasa59/ai-agent-papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts masamasa59/ai-agent-papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named masamasa59/ai-agent-papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo masamasa59/ai-agent-papers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name masamasa59/ai-agent-papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of masamasa59/ai-agent-papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/masamasa59/ai-agent-papers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/masamasa59/ai-agent-papers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/masamasa59/ai-agent-papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/masamasa59/ai-agent-papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

masamasa59/ai-agent-papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite