REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers
Default branch main · commit aa40b127 · scanned 5/20/2026, 1:57:32 AM
GitHub: 2,299 stars · 147 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highlicense#1Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a `LICENSE` file in the root of the repository with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) to clarify usage terms.
- highreadme#2Reposition the README's opening to emphasize its curated nature and scope
Why:
CURRENTA repo lists papers related to LLM based agent.
COPY-PASTE FIXA meticulously curated and actively updated repository listing research papers related to LLM-based agents, categorized by survey, technique, interaction, application, and more. This resource is designed for researchers, developers, and students seeking a structured overview of advancements in the LLM agent field.
- mediumhomepage#3Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXSet the homepage URL in the repository's About section to `https://github.com/AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers`.
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- arXiv.org · recommended 1×
- Google Scholar · recommended 1×
- Hugging Face Blog · recommended 1×
- Hugging Face Papers · recommended 1×
- Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find recent research papers and comprehensive surveys on large language model agents?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- arXiv.org
- Google Scholar
- Hugging Face Blog
- Hugging Face Papers
- Semantic Scholar
- Distill.pub
- OpenAI
- Google AI
- Anthropic
- DeepMind
- Alignment Research Center
- LessWrong
- AI Alignment Forum
- NeurIPS
- ICML
- ICLR
- ACL
- EMNLP
- AAAI
- IJCAI
- GitHub Repositories
AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYLooking for academic papers exploring advanced techniques for improving LLM agent performance and memory mechanisms.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
- Recurrent Memory Transformer
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
- ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
- Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models
- Memory-Augmented Large Language Models are Computationally Universal
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers?passAI did not name AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
AGI-Edgerunners/LLM-Agents-Papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite