RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sentient-engineering/jobber

Default branch main · commit 43b2b690 · scanned 5/31/2026, 2:58:13 AM

GitHub: 703 stars · 118 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sentient-engineering/jobber, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Make Jobber's purpose the primary README H1

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # sentient
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Jobber - Apply to Relevant Jobs on Internet Autonomously
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, browser-automation, job-application, autonomous-agent, web-automation, llm, python
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the repository's About description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    browser controlling AI agent that applies to relavant jobs on internet autonomously. join chat @ https://discord.gg/umgnyQU2K8
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An autonomous AI agent that controls your browser to search and apply for relevant jobs on the internet on your behalf. Join chat @ https://discord.gg/umgnyQU2K8

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sentient-engineering/jobber
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  4. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  5. explosion/spaCy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate job applications using an AI-driven browser agent?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. OpenAI API
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    5. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    6. NLTK (nltk/nltk)
    7. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    8. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    9. Google Cloud Natural Language API
    10. Azure AI Language
    11. Robocorp
    12. Browserless.io
    13. Apify
    14. 2Captcha
    15. Anti-Captcha

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named sentient-engineering/jobber. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source framework to build AI agents for autonomous web interaction.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Selenium
    3. Puppeteer
    4. Autogen
    5. LangChain
    6. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named sentient-engineering/jobber. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sentient-engineering/jobber?
    pass
    AI named sentient-engineering/jobber explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sentient-engineering/jobber in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sentient-engineering/jobber explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sentient-engineering/jobber solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sentient-engineering/jobber explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sentient-engineering/jobber. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sentient-engineering/jobber.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sentient-engineering/jobber)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sentient-engineering/jobber"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sentient-engineering/jobber.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sentient-engineering/jobber — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite