REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

safety-research/bloom

Default branch main · commit 7a184286 · scanned 5/23/2026, 8:57:49 AM

GitHub: 1,330 stars · 168 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

35 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface safety-research/bloom, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Add a clarifying sentence to the README's opening to distinguish from the BLOOM LLM

Why:

CURRENT

# Bloom: Automated Behavioral Evaluations for LLMs

COPY-PASTE FIX

# Bloom: Automated Behavioral Evaluations for LLMs

This repository provides a tool for evaluating Large Language Models, and is not the BLOOM LLM model itself.

hightopics#2

Add relevant topics to improve categorization

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

llm-evaluation, llm-safety, behavioral-testing, ai-ethics, large-language-models, nlp, machine-learning

mediumhomepage#3
Set the homepage URL to the new repository location
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
https://meridianlabs-ai.github.io/petri_bloom
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface safety-research/bloom

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

LLM-Evals (Hugging Face)

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

LLM-Evals (Hugging Face) · recommended 1×
DeepEval · recommended 1×
Arize AI Phoenix · recommended 1×
Fiddler AI · recommended 1×
Giskard · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
Need a way to automatically evaluate LLM outputs for sycophancy, bias, and other specific behaviors.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LLM-Evals (Hugging Face)
2. DeepEval
3. Arize AI Phoenix
4. Fiddler AI
5. Giskard
6. PromptLayer
7. LangChain
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named safety-research/bloom. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What tools help create dynamic evaluation suites for LLM behavioral assessment, beyond static benchmarks?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
2. DeepEval (confident-ai/deepeval)
3. Ragas (explodinggradients/ragas)
4. Phoenix (from Arize AI) (Arize-AI/phoenix)
5. Galileo (Observe AI)
6. Humanloop
7. OpenAI Evals (openai/evals)
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named safety-research/bloom. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of safety-research/bloom?
pass
AI named safety-research/bloom explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts safety-research/bloom in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named safety-research/bloom explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo safety-research/bloom solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named safety-research/bloom explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of safety-research/bloom. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/safety-research/bloom.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/safety-research/bloom)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/safety-research/bloom"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/safety-research/bloom.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

safety-research/bloom — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite