RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

FoundationVision/Groma

Default branch main · commit d3a95b6c · scanned 6/2/2026, 9:23:16 AM

GitHub: 586 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface FoundationVision/Groma, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the project's domain in the README's opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Groma is an MLLM with exceptional region understanding and visual grounding capabilities. It can take user-defined region inputs (boxes) as well as generate long-form responses that are grounded to visual context.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Groma is a cutting-edge Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) focused on general-purpose visual understanding and grounding, *not geospatial analysis*. It excels at processing user-defined region inputs (boxes) and generating long-form responses deeply grounded in visual context.
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance the 'About' description for clarity and keyword alignment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [ECCV2024] Grounded Multimodal Large Language Model with Localized Visual Tokenization
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Groma is an ECCV2024 Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) that provides state-of-the-art visual grounding and region understanding through novel localized visual tokenization. Ideal for researchers and developers building MLLMs that process user-defined visual regions and generate grounded responses.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Other MLLMs
    
    Groma distinguishes itself from other Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) like GPT-4V, Llama-2-V, BLIP-2, and MiniGPT-4 by introducing a novel visual tokenizer for localization. This approach enables superior region understanding and visual grounding capabilities, particularly for processing user-defined region inputs, offering a distinct paradigm compared to LLM-for-localization or external-module-for-localization methods.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface FoundationVision/Groma
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI's GPT-4V (Vision)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI's GPT-4V (Vision) · recommended 1×
  2. Llama-2-V · recommended 1×
  3. salesforce/BLIP2 · recommended 1×
  4. Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT-4 · recommended 1×
  5. Flamingo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a multimodal LLM with strong visual grounding and region understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI's GPT-4V (Vision)
    2. Llama-2-V
    3. BLIP-2 (salesforce/BLIP2)
    4. MiniGPT-4 (Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT-4)
    5. Flamingo
    6. CLIP (openai/CLIP)
    7. Detectron2 (facebookresearch/detectron2)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named FoundationVision/Groma. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an MLLM that can process user-defined visual regions for grounded responses.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4o
    2. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    3. LLaVA (haotian-liu/LLaVA)
    4. Fuyu-8B (adept/fuyu-8b)
    5. OWL-ViT (google-research/owlvit)
    6. Grounding DINO (IDEA-Research/GroundingDINO)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named FoundationVision/Groma. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of FoundationVision/Groma?
    pass
    AI did not name FoundationVision/Groma — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts FoundationVision/Groma in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named FoundationVision/Groma explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo FoundationVision/Groma solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named FoundationVision/Groma explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of FoundationVision/Groma. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/FoundationVision/Groma.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/FoundationVision/Groma)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/FoundationVision/Groma"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/FoundationVision/Groma.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

FoundationVision/Groma — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite