RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins

Default branch master · commit 84cdb22a · scanned 5/17/2026, 4:42:36 PM

GitHub: 3,835 stars · 539 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    auto-gpt, plugins, ai-agent, autonomous-ai, gpt, tools, extensions, significant-gravitas
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Tool Calling · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best ways to extend an AI agent's functionality with custom tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Tool Calling
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. AutoGPT
    7. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a repository of add-ons to enhance my AI automation scripts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Hub
    2. GitHub Marketplace / GitHub Explore
    3. PyPI (Python Package Index)
    4. Awesome AI/ML Lists
    5. Kaggle
    6. TensorFlow Hub
    7. PyTorch Hub
    8. OpenAI API
    9. Google Cloud AI Platform
    10. AWS AI Services

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins?
    pass
    AI did not name Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugins — RepoGEO report