RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cso1z/Feishu-MCP

Default branch main · commit b76adf79 · scanned 6/7/2026, 1:32:02 PM

GitHub: 686 stars · 83 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cso1z/Feishu-MCP, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    为 Cursor、Windsurf、Cline 和其他 AI 驱动的编码工具提供访问、编辑和结构化处理飞书文档的能力，**并支持飞书任务管理和用户信息查询**，基于 Model Context Protocol 服务器实现。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Feishu-MCP 是一个专为 AI 编码工具和 AI Agent 设计的飞书集成工具包**，它通过 Model Context Protocol 服务器和独立的 CLI 工具，赋能 Cursor、Claude Code 等 AI 驱动的工具，实现对飞书文档的访问、编辑、结构化处理，以及飞书任务管理和用户信息查询。
  • hightopics#2
    Add broader, more descriptive topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    feishu, lark, mcp, skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    feishu, lark, mcp, skills, ai-agents, enterprise-integration, collaboration-tools, document-automation, task-management, llm-tools
  • mediumabout#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/cso1z/Feishu-MCP

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cso1z/Feishu-MCP
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 3×
  2. Azure AI Services · recommended 1×
  3. Form Recognizer (now Document Intelligence) · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  5. Llama 2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable AI coding tools to read and edit enterprise documents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Azure AI Services
    3. Form Recognizer (now Document Intelligence)
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    5. Llama 2
    6. Mistral
    7. Falcon
    8. LangChain
    9. LlamaIndex
    10. Apache Tika
    11. python-docx
    12. openpyxl
    13. PyPDF2
    14. python-pptx
    15. Google Cloud Document AI
    16. PaLM 2
    17. Vertex AI

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named cso1z/Feishu-MCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a way to manage tasks and user info in a collaboration platform using AI agents.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Asana
    2. Zapier
    3. Make
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Jira Software
    6. Atlassian Intelligence
    7. Jira Automation
    8. Microsoft Loop
    9. Copilot
    10. ClickUp
    11. ClickUp AI
    12. Trello
    13. Power-Ups
    14. Butler
    15. OpenAI API
    16. Monday.com
    17. Monday AI

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named cso1z/Feishu-MCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cso1z/Feishu-MCP?
    pass
    AI named cso1z/Feishu-MCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cso1z/Feishu-MCP in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cso1z/Feishu-MCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cso1z/Feishu-MCP solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cso1z/Feishu-MCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cso1z/Feishu-MCP. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cso1z/Feishu-MCP.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cso1z/Feishu-MCP)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cso1z/Feishu-MCP"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cso1z/Feishu-MCP.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cso1z/Feishu-MCP — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite