RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ray-project/llm-applications

Default branch main · commit 2044d3fa · scanned 5/24/2026, 3:22:47 PM

GitHub: 1,855 stars · 255 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ray-project/llm-applications, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize "guide" and "production RAG"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # LLM Applications
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LLM Applications: A Comprehensive Guide for Production RAG
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for RAG, best practices, and production

    Why:

    CURRENT
    anyscale, fine-tuning, llama2, llms, machine-learning, openai, ray, serving
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    anyscale, fine-tuning, llama2, llms, machine-learning, openai, ray, serving, rag, best-practices, llm-ops, evaluation, production-ready
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.anyscale.com/blog/a-comprehensive-guide-for-building-rag-based-llm-applications-part-1

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ray-project/llm-applications
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LlamaIndex
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. Haystack · recommended 1×
  4. Weaviate · recommended 1×
  5. Pinecone · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to develop and scale retrieval augmented generation applications for production?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. LangChain
    3. Haystack
    4. Weaviate
    5. Pinecone
    6. Qdrant
    7. Elasticsearch

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ray-project/llm-applications. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are best practices for evaluating and serving production-ready LLM applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MLflow (mlflow/mlflow)
    2. Weights & Biases
    3. Arize AI
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. Scale AI
    6. Appen
    7. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    8. KServe (kserve/kserve)
    9. NVIDIA Triton Inference Server (triton-inference-server/server)
    10. AWS SageMaker Endpoints
    11. Azure Machine Learning Endpoints
    12. Google Cloud Vertex AI Endpoints
    13. Hugging Face Inference Endpoints
    14. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    15. Uvicorn (encode/uvicorn)
    16. Gunicorn (benoitc/gunicorn)

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named ray-project/llm-applications. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ray-project/llm-applications?
    pass
    AI named ray-project/llm-applications explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ray-project/llm-applications in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ray-project/llm-applications explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ray-project/llm-applications solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ray-project/llm-applications explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ray-project/llm-applications. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ray-project/llm-applications.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ray-project/llm-applications)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ray-project/llm-applications"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ray-project/llm-applications.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ray-project/llm-applications — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite