RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

didi/xiaoju-survey

Default branch main · commit 7f3f60aa · scanned 5/16/2026, 12:17:33 PM

GitHub: 3,749 stars · 504 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface didi/xiaoju-survey, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's English introduction to emphasize 'enterprise-grade, AI-powered, self-hostable platform'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with badges and Chinese text, then 'XIAOJUSURVEY是一套轻量、安全的调研系统，提供面向个人和企业的一站式产品级解决方案，用于构建各类问卷、考试、测评和复杂表单，快速满足各类线上调研场景.' followed by an English translation.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a prominent English paragraph at the very top of the README (after badges, before any Chinese text) that clearly states: 'XIAOJUSURVEY is a comprehensive, self-hostable enterprise platform for dynamic form building, AI-powered survey generation, and advanced data analytics. It provides a secure, full-stack solution for creating questionnaires, exams, polls, and quizzes, designed for both individual and enterprise-level data collection and analysis.'
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve category matching

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, dynamic-form-builder, enterprises, form, form-builder, java, llm, nodejs, question, quiz, react-native, survey, vue3
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-powered, data-analytics, enterprise-platform, self-hostable, survey-platform, quiz-platform
  • lowreadme#3
    Explicitly highlight the self-hostable, full-stack nature as a key differentiator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README has a '项目优势' (Project Advantages) section, but the excerpt is truncated and it's in Chinese. It might not explicitly compare to SaaS.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a dedicated section titled 'Why Choose XIAOJUSURVEY?' or integrate into an existing 'Advantages' section, stating: 'Unlike many SaaS alternatives, XIAOJUSURVEY offers a complete, full-stack, and self-hostable enterprise solution, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface didi/xiaoju-survey
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Salesforce Experience Cloud · recommended 1×
  2. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Voice · recommended 1×
  3. Qualtrics CoreXM · recommended 1×
  4. Jotform Enterprise · recommended 1×
  5. Formstack Platform · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need an enterprise-grade dynamic form builder with advanced data analysis capabilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Salesforce Experience Cloud
    2. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Voice
    3. Qualtrics CoreXM
    4. Jotform Enterprise
    5. Formstack Platform
    6. Wufoo

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named didi/xiaoju-survey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a platform to generate quizzes and surveys using AI with data analytics.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SurveyMonkey
    2. Qualtrics
    3. Typeform
    4. Jotform
    5. QuestionPro
    6. Alchemer

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named didi/xiaoju-survey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of didi/xiaoju-survey?
    pass
    AI named didi/xiaoju-survey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts didi/xiaoju-survey in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named didi/xiaoju-survey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo didi/xiaoju-survey solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named didi/xiaoju-survey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of didi/xiaoju-survey. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/didi/xiaoju-survey.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/didi/xiaoju-survey)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/didi/xiaoju-survey"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/didi/xiaoju-survey.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

didi/xiaoju-survey — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite