RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lencx/nofwl

Default branch main · commit f2dd0ddc · scanned 5/27/2026, 6:47:03 AM

GitHub: 4,155 stars · 390 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lencx/nofwl, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's main description to clearly state NoFWL's core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">NoFWL Desktop Application (Mac, Windows and Linux)</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">A cross-platform desktop application for simplified firewall rule management.</p>
  • hightopics#2
    Remove misleading 'chatgpt' topic and add specific firewall-related topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    application, chatgpt, desktop, linux, macos, tauri, windows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    application, desktop, linux, macos, tauri, windows, firewall, network-security, packet-filter
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to complete the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://lencx.github.io/nofwl

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lencx/nofwl
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
electron/electron
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. electron/electron · recommended 1×
  2. tauri-apps/tauri · recommended 1×
  3. qt/qtbase · recommended 1×
  4. flutter/flutter · recommended 1×
  5. nwjs/nw.js · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a dedicated desktop application for an AI conversational agent on multiple operating systems.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Electron (electron/electron)
    2. Tauri (tauri-apps/tauri)
    3. Qt (qt/qtbase)
    4. Flutter (flutter/flutter)
    5. NW.js (nwjs/nw.js)
    6. Xamarin.Forms (xamarin/xamarin.forms)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named lencx/nofwl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a powerful native client for interacting with generative AI services on my computer.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    3. Jan (janhq/jan)
    4. GPT4All (nomic-ai/gpt4all)
    5. LocalAI (mudler/LocalAI)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named lencx/nofwl. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lencx/nofwl?
    pass
    AI named lencx/nofwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lencx/nofwl in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lencx/nofwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lencx/nofwl solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named lencx/nofwl explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lencx/nofwl. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lencx/nofwl.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lencx/nofwl)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lencx/nofwl"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lencx/nofwl.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lencx/nofwl — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite