RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

poleHansen/baibaiAIGC

Default branch main · commit 67d0fe99 · scanned 6/9/2026, 12:56:48 PM

GitHub: 873 stars · 87 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface poleHansen/baibaiAIGC, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # baibaiAIGC

<div align="center">
   
</div>

本仓库支持四种使用方式：
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # baibaiAIGC

一个专注于降低中文文档（尤其是学术论文）中AIGC痕迹的工具，支持分段改写并保留原有结构。本仓库提供对话skill、脚本API、Web界面和独立App四种使用方式。

<div align="center">
   
</div>

本仓库支持四种使用方式：
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for de-AIGC and academic writing

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    aigc-reduction, chinese-nlp, academic-writing, document-rewriting, ai-trace-removal, text-processing
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add repository URL as homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/poleHansen/baibaiAIGC

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface poleHansen/baibaiAIGC
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuillBot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  2. DeepL Write · recommended 2×
  3. Editage · recommended 1×
  4. AJE (American Journal Experts) · recommended 1×
  5. Grammarly · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to reduce AI generated content markers in Chinese academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Editage
    2. AJE (American Journal Experts)
    3. QuillBot
    4. Grammarly
    5. DeepL Write
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Jianying (剪映)
    8. CapCut
    9. Pleco
    10. Turnitin's AI detection feature
    11. GPTZero
    12. Originality.ai

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named poleHansen/baibaiAIGC. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to rewrite long documents in segments while preserving original structure.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. QuillBot
    2. Jasper
    3. Copy.ai
    4. Wordtune
    5. DeepL Write
    6. Grammarly Business/Premium
    7. Rytr

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named poleHansen/baibaiAIGC. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of poleHansen/baibaiAIGC?
    pass
    AI named poleHansen/baibaiAIGC explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts poleHansen/baibaiAIGC in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named poleHansen/baibaiAIGC explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo poleHansen/baibaiAIGC solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named poleHansen/baibaiAIGC explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of poleHansen/baibaiAIGC. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/poleHansen/baibaiAIGC.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/poleHansen/baibaiAIGC)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/poleHansen/baibaiAIGC"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/poleHansen/baibaiAIGC.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

poleHansen/baibaiAIGC — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite