RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

andrehuang/research-companion

Default branch main · commit 733e9e8e · scanned 6/3/2026, 10:42:27 AM

GitHub: 671 stars · 57 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface andrehuang/research-companion, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["strategic-research", "idea-evaluation", "project-triage", "brainstorming", "claude-code", "ai-assistant", "research-workflow", "academic-research"]
  • highcomparison#2
    Add a dedicated 'What makes it different?' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., 'What makes Research Companion different?', explicitly stating: 'Unlike tools focused on literature review (Elicit, ResearchRabbit) or general AI assistance (ChatGPT), Research Companion specializes in strategic idea evaluation, project triage, and structured brainstorming. Its core purpose is to help you decide *which* papers to write, not just how to write them or find existing research.'
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository homepage URL in the 'About' section to a relevant project page, documentation, or the `researcher-pack` repository if it provides a more comprehensive overview of the integrated toolkit.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface andrehuang/research-companion
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT / GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. Scopus AI / Dimensions AI · recommended 1×
  4. ResearchRabbit · recommended 1×
  5. Connected Papers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools help researchers strategically evaluate project ideas before writing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    3. Scopus AI / Dimensions AI
    4. ResearchRabbit
    5. Connected Papers
    6. Semantic Scholar

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named andrehuang/research-companion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need AI assistant for academic project brainstorming and idea prioritization.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Perplexity AI
    4. Google Gemini
    5. Notion AI
    6. Elicit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named andrehuang/research-companion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of andrehuang/research-companion?
    pass
    AI named andrehuang/research-companion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts andrehuang/research-companion in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named andrehuang/research-companion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo andrehuang/research-companion solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named andrehuang/research-companion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of andrehuang/research-companion. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/andrehuang/research-companion.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/andrehuang/research-companion)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/andrehuang/research-companion"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/andrehuang/research-companion.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

andrehuang/research-companion — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite