RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

facebookresearch/balance

Default branch main · commit a84cba30 · scanned 6/6/2026, 3:06:44 PM

GitHub: 747 stars · 56 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface facebookresearch/balance, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise, domain-specific summary sentence after the main title

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A Python package for survey statisticians, social scientists, and data analysts to correct for non-response bias, sampling bias, and selection bias in observational data, enabling robust population inference.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Explicitly mention 'reweighting' and common methods in the 'What is _balance_?' section

    Why:

    CURRENT
    What is _balance_? **_balance_ is a Python package** offering a simple workflow and methods for **dealing with biased data samples** when looking to infer from them to some population of interest. Biased samples often occur in survey statistics when respondents present non-response bias or survey suffers from sampling bias (that are not missing completely at random). A similar issue arises in observational studies when comparing the treated vs untreated groups, and in any data that suffers from selection bias.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    What is _balance_? **_balance_ is a Python package** offering a simple workflow and **reweighting methods** for **dealing with biased data samples** when looking to infer from them to some population of interest. It helps correct for issues like non-response bias, sampling bias, and selection bias often found in survey statistics and observational studies.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface facebookresearch/balance
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
R
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. R · recommended 1×
  2. survey · recommended 1×
  3. anesrake · recommended 1×
  4. SAS · recommended 1×
  5. PROC SURVEYWEIGHT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to correct for non-response bias in survey data for accurate population inference?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. R
    2. survey
    3. anesrake
    4. SAS
    5. PROC SURVEYWEIGHT
    6. Stata
    7. svy
    8. WeightIt
    9. Python
    10. scikit-learn
    11. mice
    12. Amelia
    13. PROC MI
    14. PROC MIANALYZE
    15. mi impute
    16. mi estimate
    17. heckman
    18. sampleSelection

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named facebookresearch/balance. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Python library to adjust for sample selection bias and reweight data for analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. causalinference (laurencium/causalinference)
    2. DoWhy (microsoft/dowhy)
    3. EconML (microsoft/econml)
    4. statsmodels (statsmodels/statsmodels)
    5. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named facebookresearch/balance. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of facebookresearch/balance?
    pass
    AI named facebookresearch/balance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts facebookresearch/balance in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named facebookresearch/balance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo facebookresearch/balance solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named facebookresearch/balance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of facebookresearch/balance. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/facebookresearch/balance.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/facebookresearch/balance)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/facebookresearch/balance"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/facebookresearch/balance.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

facebookresearch/balance — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite