RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

TQZHR/grok2api

Default branch main · commit b0c93941 · scanned 6/11/2026, 4:13:23 AM

GitHub: 684 stars · 949 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface TQZHR/grok2api, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to highlight core purpose and platform

    Why:

    CURRENT
    本项目为对 chenyme/grok2api 的二次修改与增强。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Grok2API provides an OpenAI-compatible API gateway for xAI's Grok model, optimized for one-click deployment on Cloudflare Workers. It supports streaming/non-streaming chat, image generation/editing, and deep thought capabilities, with integrated pool concurrency and automatic load balancing.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    grok, grok-api, openai-api, cloudflare-workers, serverless, api-gateway, llm, ai-chat, image-generation, typescript, python, fastapi, one-click-deploy
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/TQZHR/grok2api

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface TQZHR/grok2api
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cloudflare Workers AI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cloudflare Workers AI · recommended 1×
  2. Cloudflare Workers · recommended 1×
  3. AWS Lambda@Edge · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon API Gateway · recommended 1×
  5. AWS Lambda · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to deploy an AI model API gateway on serverless edge compute?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare Workers AI
    2. Cloudflare Workers
    3. AWS Lambda@Edge
    4. Amazon API Gateway
    5. AWS Lambda
    6. SageMaker endpoint
    7. Vercel Edge Functions
    8. Vercel AI SDK
    9. Next.js
    10. Netlify Edge Functions
    11. Netlify Functions
    12. Fastly Compute@Edge
    13. Azure Front Door
    14. Azure Functions
    15. Azure Machine Learning

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named TQZHR/grok2api. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a robust API for AI chat and image generation with one-click deployment.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Hugging Face Inference API
    3. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    4. Azure OpenAI Service
    5. Replicate
    6. AWS Bedrock

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named TQZHR/grok2api. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of TQZHR/grok2api?
    pass
    AI named TQZHR/grok2api explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts TQZHR/grok2api in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named TQZHR/grok2api explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo TQZHR/grok2api solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named TQZHR/grok2api explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of TQZHR/grok2api. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/TQZHR/grok2api.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/TQZHR/grok2api)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/TQZHR/grok2api"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/TQZHR/grok2api.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

TQZHR/grok2api — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite