RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

google-research/football

Default branch master · commit 3d9e7547 · scanned 5/19/2026, 12:42:20 AM

GitHub: 3,601 stars · 1,362 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface google-research/football, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Check out the new game server:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The official Google Research Football repository: an open-source reinforcement learning environment for training AI agents in a realistic 3D football (soccer) simulation.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    reinforcement-learning, reinforcement-learning-environments
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    reinforcement-learning, reinforcement-learning-environments, sports-simulation, football, soccer, multi-agent-systems, deep-learning
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
    
    *   **Purpose-built for Football RL:** A highly optimized 3D simulation environment specifically designed for multi-agent reinforcement learning in football (soccer).
    *   **Lightweight & Performant:** Offers a ready-to-use, performant, and customizable platform tailored for AI research.
    *   **Realistic Gameplay:** Based on open-source game Gameplay Football, providing realistic physics and game mechanics.
    *   **Research-focused:** Created by the Google Brain team for advanced AI and machine learning research.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface google-research/football
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Research Football (GRF)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Research Football (GRF) · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI Gym's Roboschool · recommended 1×
  3. Unity ML-Agents · recommended 1×
  4. DeepMind Lab · recommended 1×
  5. Gym-Panda · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good reinforcement learning environments for training agents in sports simulations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Research Football (GRF)
    2. OpenAI Gym's Roboschool
    3. Unity ML-Agents
    4. DeepMind Lab
    5. Gym-Panda
    6. PyBullet

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named google-research/football. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking open-source physics-based simulation environments for multi-agent reinforcement learning research?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MuJoCo (deepmind/mujoco)
    2. Isaac Gym
    3. Isaac Sim
    4. PyBullet (bulletphysics/bullet3)
    5. Gazebo (osrf/gazebo)
    6. Gymnasium (Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium)
    7. Unity ML-Agents (Unity-Technologies/ml-agents)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named google-research/football. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of google-research/football?
    pass
    AI named google-research/football explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts google-research/football in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named google-research/football explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo google-research/football solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named google-research/football explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of google-research/football. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/football.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/football)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/football"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/football.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

google-research/football — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite