RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes

Default branch master · commit bce08151 · scanned 6/11/2026, 6:27:51 PM

GitHub: 799 stars · 174 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify it's a curated list/resource

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Single-cell RNA-seq related tools and genomics data analysis resources.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is a comprehensive, curated list of single-cell RNA-seq data analysis tools, papers, and genomics resources.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add topics that clarify the repository's nature as a curated list/resource

    Why:

    CURRENT
    scrna-seq, single-cell
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    scrna-seq, single-cell, bioinformatics, genomics, awesome-list
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
satijalab/seurat
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. satijalab/seurat · recommended 1×
  2. scverse/scanpy · recommended 1×
  3. Cell Ranger · recommended 1×
  4. cole-trapnell-lab/monocle3 · recommended 1×
  5. aertslab/SCENIC · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Seurat (satijalab/seurat)
    2. Scanpy (scverse/scanpy)
    3. Cell Ranger
    4. Monocle 3 (cole-trapnell-lab/monocle3)
    5. SCENIC (aertslab/SCENIC)
    6. Velocyto.py (velocyto-team/velocyto.py)
    7. scVelo (scverse/scvelo)
    8. SPRING (AllonKleinLab/SPRING)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find resources for scRNA-seq data quality control and batch correction?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Seurat
    2. Scanpy
    3. Harmony
    4. scDblFinder
    5. SoupX
    6. CellBender
    7. ComBat

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes?
    pass
    AI named mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mdozmorov/scRNA-seq_notes — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite