RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

pinchbench/skill

Default branch main · commit 819384ae · scanned 6/24/2026, 11:52:10 PM

GitHub: 1,250 stars · 143 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface pinchbench/skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening paragraph for AI clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🦀 PinchBench
    
    **Real-world benchmarks for AI coding agents**
    
    [](https://pinchbench.com)
    [](LICENSE)
    
    > **Note:** This repository contains the benchmark skill/tasks. It is NOT the source of official leaderboard results. To add models to the official results, modify pinchbench/scripts/default-models.yml.
    
    PinchBench measures how well LLM models perform as the brain of an OpenClaw agent. Instead of synthetic tests, we throw real tasks at agents: scheduling meetings, writing code, triaging email, researching topics, and managing files.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🦀 PinchBench
    
    **PinchBench provides real-world benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as autonomous coding agents.** It measures how well LLM models perform as the brain of an OpenClaw agent by throwing real tasks at them: scheduling meetings, writing code, triaging email, researching topics, and managing files.
    
    > **Note:** This repository contains the benchmark skill/tasks. It is NOT the source of official leaderboard results. To add models to the official results, modify pinchbench/scripts/default-models.yml.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a comparison section to differentiate from other LLM benchmarks

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why PinchBench vs. Other Benchmarks?
    
    While benchmarks like ALFWorld, MiniWoB++, and ToolBench are valuable for assessing specific LLM capabilities, PinchBench focuses uniquely on evaluating LLMs as **autonomous coding agents** performing **real-world, multi-step tasks**. We emphasize practical outcomes and the ability to handle ambiguous instructions, differentiating us from benchmarks that often rely on synthetic environments or isolated skill tests.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface pinchbench/skill
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Scale AI Platform
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Scale AI Platform · recommended 1×
  2. Google Forms · recommended 1×
  3. Typeform · recommended 1×
  4. pytest-dev/pytest · recommended 1×
  5. junit-team/junit5 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to evaluate large language models acting as autonomous coding assistants on practical tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Scale AI Platform
    2. Google Forms
    3. Typeform
    4. Pytest (pytest-dev/pytest)
    5. JUnit (junit-team/junit5)
    6. Jest (facebook/jest)
    7. Go's `testing` package
    8. Codewars
    9. LeetCode
    10. Pylint (pylint-dev/pylint)
    11. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    12. SonarQube
    13. Black (psf/black)
    14. Prettier (prettier/prettier)
    15. CodeBLEU
    16. Tree-Sitter (tree-sitter/tree-sitter)
    17. OpenAI Embeddings
    18. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
    19. `timeit` module
    20. `cProfile`
    21. `perf`
    22. JMeter
    23. Locust (locustio/locust)
    24. Bandit (PyCQA/bandit)
    25. Snyk
    26. OWASP ZAP (zaproxy/zaproxy)

    AI recommended 26 alternatives but never named pinchbench/skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust benchmarks for assessing AI agent performance on complex, multi-step tasks with tool use?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ALFWorld
    2. MiniWoB++
    3. ToolBench
    4. WebArena
    5. ScienceWorld
    6. HotpotQA

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named pinchbench/skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of pinchbench/skill?
    pass
    AI named pinchbench/skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts pinchbench/skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named pinchbench/skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo pinchbench/skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named pinchbench/skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of pinchbench/skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/pinchbench/skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/pinchbench/skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/pinchbench/skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/pinchbench/skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

pinchbench/skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite