RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

7836246/cursor2api

Default branch main · commit 1fb66fa6 · scanned 5/11/2026, 4:56:57 AM

GitHub: 1,789 stars · 513 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 7836246/cursor2api, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening sentence to clarify 'Cursor' refers to an AI coding assistant

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cursor2API v2.7.8

> 20260401 Cursor文档页仅剩gemini-3-flash （凉）

将 Cursor 文档页免费 AI 对话接口代理转换为 **Anthropic Messages API** 和 **OpenAI Chat Completions API**，支持 **Claude Code** 和 **Cursor IDE** 使用。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cursor2API v2.7.8 - 将 Cursor AI 编码助手免费 API 转换为 OpenAI/Anthropic 兼容格式

> 20260401 Cursor文档页仅剩gemini-3-flash （凉）

将 Cursor AI 编码助手（Cursor Web Docs）的免费 AI 对话接口代理转换为 **Anthropic Messages API** 和 **OpenAI Chat Completions API**，支持 **Claude Code** 和 **Cursor IDE** 使用。
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific AI proxy and LLM-related topics, remove ambiguous ones

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, cc, claude, cursor, gpt
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-proxy, openai-api, anthropic-api, claude-api, llm-proxy, coding-assistant, cursor-ai, gpt
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Remove misleading homepage URL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://cursor.com/cn/docs
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (none)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 7836246/cursor2api
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenRouter.ai
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenRouter.ai · recommended 2×
  2. Poe · recommended 1×
  3. jan-ai/jan · recommended 1×
  4. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  5. mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use a free AI chat service with OpenAI or Anthropic API clients?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenRouter.ai
    2. Poe
    3. Jan.ai (jan-ai/jan)
    4. LM Studio
    5. Chatbot UI (mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui)
    6. LobeChat (lobehub/lobe-chat)
    7. Hugging Face Chat

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 7836246/cursor2api. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a proxy to adapt free AI models for Anthropic Messages API and solve output truncation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter.ai
    3. LocalAI
    4. FastChat
    5. NGINX
    6. Cloudflare Workers

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 7836246/cursor2api. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 7836246/cursor2api?
    pass
    AI did not name 7836246/cursor2api — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 7836246/cursor2api in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 7836246/cursor2api explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 7836246/cursor2api solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name 7836246/cursor2api — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 7836246/cursor2api. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/7836246/cursor2api.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/7836246/cursor2api)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/7836246/cursor2api"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/7836246/cursor2api.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

7836246/cursor2api — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
7836246/cursor2api — RepoGEO report