RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

kevinluosl/deepbot

Default branch main · commit 027fd701 · scanned 6/25/2026, 10:01:49 PM

GitHub: 2,355 stars · 187 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface kevinluosl/deepbot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly state DeepBot's purpose and clarify it is not a Discord bot in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a sentence early in the README, such as: "DeepBot is a system-level AI assistant for enterprise productivity and personal workflows, *not* a Discord bot or a general-purpose chatbot. It focuses on automating complex business processes through multi-agent collaboration and deep system integration."
  • hightopics#2
    Expand topics to include enterprise automation and workflow terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-skills, agent-tools, agentic-workflow, agentos, ai-agents, harness, harness-engineering, openclaw
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-skills, agent-tools, agentic-workflow, agentos, ai-agents, harness, harness-engineering, openclaw, enterprise-automation, workflow-automation, ai-workflow, business-automation, productivity-tools, system-automation, multi-agent-system, enterprise-ai
  • mediumabout#3
    Enhance the repository description to highlight enterprise workflow automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    DeepBot is a system-level AI assistant built for both personal productivity and enterprise workflows — one-click setup, seamless experience, and native Feishu integration.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    DeepBot is an enterprise-grade, system-level AI assistant for automating complex business workflows and enhancing personal productivity. It features multi-agent collaboration, deep integration with existing enterprise systems, and native Feishu support.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface kevinluosl/deepbot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Microsoft Power Automate
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Microsoft Power Automate · recommended 1×
  2. Zapier · recommended 1×
  3. UiPath · recommended 1×
  4. Workato · recommended 1×
  5. n8n-io/n8n · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI assistant for automating system-level tasks and enterprise productivity workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft Power Automate
    2. Zapier
    3. UiPath
    4. Workato
    5. n8n (n8n-io/n8n)
    6. IFTTT

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named kevinluosl/deepbot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What multi-agent AI platforms offer built-in tools for document processing and web integration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGPT
    5. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    6. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named kevinluosl/deepbot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of kevinluosl/deepbot?
    pass
    AI named kevinluosl/deepbot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts kevinluosl/deepbot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named kevinluosl/deepbot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo kevinluosl/deepbot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named kevinluosl/deepbot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of kevinluosl/deepbot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/kevinluosl/deepbot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/kevinluosl/deepbot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/kevinluosl/deepbot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/kevinluosl/deepbot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

kevinluosl/deepbot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite