RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

symgraph/IDAssist

Default branch master · commit 44c0c16f · scanned 5/29/2026, 2:17:40 PM

GitHub: 514 stars · 49 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface symgraph/IDAssist, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface symgraph/IDAssist
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IDA Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IDA Pro · recommended 2×
  2. Ghidra · recommended 2×
  3. Binwalk · recommended 2×
  4. Angr · recommended 2×
  5. Hex-Rays Decompiler · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to speed up binary reverse engineering workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. Hex-Rays Decompiler
    3. Ghidra
    4. ChatGPT
    5. GPT-4
    6. Claude
    7. Gemini
    8. Binwalk
    9. Panda
    10. Angr
    11. DeepCode
    12. Snyk Code

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named symgraph/IDAssist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide AI-driven function analysis and renaming for compiled executables?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. Ghidra
    3. Binwalk
    4. Angr
    5. Radare2
    6. Cutter

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named symgraph/IDAssist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of symgraph/IDAssist?
    pass
    AI named symgraph/IDAssist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts symgraph/IDAssist in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named symgraph/IDAssist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo symgraph/IDAssist solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named symgraph/IDAssist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of symgraph/IDAssist. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/symgraph/IDAssist.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/symgraph/IDAssist)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/symgraph/IDAssist"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/symgraph/IDAssist.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

symgraph/IDAssist — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite