REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list

Default branch master · commit fff4f67a · scanned 6/16/2026, 9:16:40 AM

GitHub: 961 stars · 41 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

22 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highabout#1

Update the repository's 'About' description to clarify its nature

Why:

CURRENT

A reading list for the modern critical programmer

COPY-PASTE FIX

A community-curated GitHub reading list for critical programmers, focusing on the social and ethical impacts of technology.

highlicense#2
Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
Create a LICENSE file with the MIT License in the repository root.
```

mediumhomepage#3

Add a Homepage URL to the repository metadata

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Set the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings to 'https://github.com/chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list' or a dedicated project site if available.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

AI Ethics Course by Google (Coursera)

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

AI Ethics Course by Google (Coursera) · recommended 1×
Ethics of AI and Robotics (Stanford University - Online Course/Resources) · recommended 1×
Human-Centered AI (HAI) institute · recommended 1×
Data & Society Research Institute · recommended 1×
The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (Santa Clara University) · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
Where can I find resources to understand the social and ethical impacts of technology?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. AI Ethics Course by Google (Coursera)
2. Ethics of AI and Robotics (Stanford University - Online Course/Resources)
3. Human-Centered AI (HAI) institute
4. Data & Society Research Institute
5. The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (Santa Clara University)
6. Future of Life Institute (FLI)
7. AI Now Institute
8. Mozilla Foundation
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What are good curated reading lists for developers interested in technology ethics and society?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Ethics, Society, and Technology Reading List (Stanford University)
2. AI Ethics Curated Resources (Google AI)
3. Data & Society Research Institute Publications
4. The Tech We Want Reading List
5. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society (Harvard University) Publications
6. AI Ethics & Governance Reading List (Future of Life Institute)
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list?
pass
AI did not name chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

chobeat/awesome-critical-tech-reading-list — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite