RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ReScienceLab/opc-skills

Default branch main · commit fcf8a8e1 · scanned 6/13/2026, 6:36:30 PM

GitHub: 928 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ReScienceLab/opc-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumtopics#1
    Replace ambiguous topics with more specific ones

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-skills, ai-tools, claude-code, geo, llm-tools, opc, seo
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-skills, ai-tools, claude-code, llm-tools, solopreneur, indie-hacker, one-person-company, ai-automation, coding-assistant-plugins
  • lowreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Why not X?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., 'OPC Skills vs. [Competitor X]' or 'Why OPC Skills?', explaining how it complements or differs from frameworks like LangChain, LlamaIndex, or coding assistants like Cursor.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ReScienceLab/opc-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. CrewAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need tools to build custom AI agent capabilities for my solo business.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. CrewAI
    6. AutoGPT
    7. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ReScienceLab/opc-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best automation extensions for large language model coding assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. Codeium
    4. Tabnine
    5. Continue
    6. CodiumAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ReScienceLab/opc-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ReScienceLab/opc-skills?
    pass
    AI named ReScienceLab/opc-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ReScienceLab/opc-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ReScienceLab/opc-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ReScienceLab/opc-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ReScienceLab/opc-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ReScienceLab/opc-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ReScienceLab/opc-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ReScienceLab/opc-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ReScienceLab/opc-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ReScienceLab/opc-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ReScienceLab/opc-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite