REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ServiceNow/BrowserGym

Default branch main · commit 9e779f08 · scanned 6/25/2026, 10:21:52 AM

GitHub: 1,259 stars · 177 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

35 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ServiceNow/BrowserGym, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition the README to clearly state its core purpose as an RL environment

Why:

CURRENT

The README currently starts with a navigation bar, badges, and a warning, without immediately stating its core value proposition as an RL environment.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add the following sentence prominently at the beginning of the README, after any badges or navigation but before the warning: 'BrowserGym provides a Gymnasium-compatible API for creating Reinforcement Learning (RL) environments directly from arbitrary web pages and browser interactions, accelerating research in web agent development.'

mediumabout#2

Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add the official project documentation or dedicated project page URL (e.g., https://browsergym.ai or https://docs.browsergym.ai) to the 'Homepage' field in the repository's 'About' section.

lowlicense#3

Clarify the project's license(s) directly in the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a clear statement to the README, for example under a 'License' heading, specifying the exact license(s) that apply to BrowserGym, referencing the existing LICENSE file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface ServiceNow/BrowserGym

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

microsoft/playwright

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
cypress-io/cypress · recommended 1×
robotframework/robotframework · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to build and test AI agents for automating browser interactions?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
2. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
3. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
4. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
5. Robot Framework (robotframework/robotframework)
6. SeleniumLibrary (robotframework/SeleniumLibrary)
7. BrowserStack Automate
8. Sauce Labs
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ServiceNow/BrowserGym. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Framework for developing and benchmarking LLM-powered agents to automate web tasks?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Playwright
2. Puppeteer
3. LangChain
4. AutoGPT
5. BabyAGI
6. AgentGPT
7. Selenium
8. LlamaIndex
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ServiceNow/BrowserGym. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ServiceNow/BrowserGym?
pass
AI named ServiceNow/BrowserGym explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts ServiceNow/BrowserGym in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named ServiceNow/BrowserGym explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo ServiceNow/BrowserGym solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named ServiceNow/BrowserGym explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ServiceNow/BrowserGym. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ServiceNow/BrowserGym.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ServiceNow/BrowserGym)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ServiceNow/BrowserGym"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ServiceNow/BrowserGym.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ServiceNow/BrowserGym — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite