RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Hammer1/cozeworkflows

Default branch main · commit f86e2274 · scanned 5/23/2026, 2:18:11 AM

GitHub: 5,212 stars · 1,976 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Hammer1/cozeworkflows, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    coze, ai-workflows, workflow-collection, automation, productivity, bot-development, large-language-models
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) that reflects your intentions for reuse and distribution.
  • lowreadme#3
    Reinforce Coze platform focus in README opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 风哥AI工作流集合 - 200+ 实用生产力工作流
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Coze 平台专属：风哥AI工作流集合 - 200+ 实用生产力工作流

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Hammer1/cozeworkflows
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Zapier
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Zapier · recommended 2×
  2. Make · recommended 2×
  3. Microsoft Power Automate · recommended 2×
  4. n8n · recommended 2×
  5. IFTTT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a large collection of pre-built AI workflows for common productivity tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zapier
    2. Make
    3. Microsoft Power Automate
    4. IFTTT
    5. n8n
    6. Bardeen.ai

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Hammer1/cozeworkflows. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily import ready-made AI automation sequences into my workflow builder?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zapier
    2. Make
    3. ActiveCampaign
    4. n8n
    5. Microsoft Power Automate
    6. Pipedream
    7. Workato

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Hammer1/cozeworkflows. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Hammer1/cozeworkflows?
    pass
    AI named Hammer1/cozeworkflows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Hammer1/cozeworkflows in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Hammer1/cozeworkflows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Hammer1/cozeworkflows solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Hammer1/cozeworkflows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Hammer1/cozeworkflows. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Hammer1/cozeworkflows.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Hammer1/cozeworkflows)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Hammer1/cozeworkflows"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Hammer1/cozeworkflows.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Hammer1/cozeworkflows — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite