RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

chrisryugj/kordoc

Default branch main · commit 3702bc45 · scanned 6/27/2026, 8:16:53 PM

GitHub: 1,260 stars · 238 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface chrisryugj/kordoc, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumtopics#1
    Add specific topics for form-filling, document diff, AI agent integration, and automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cli, document-parser, docx, hancom, hwp, hwpx, korean, markdown, mcp, office, parser, pdf, xlsx
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cli, document-parser, docx, hancom, hwp, hwpx, korean, markdown, mcp, office, parser, pdf, xlsx, form-filling, document-diff, ai-agent, automation
  • lowcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to highlight unique features

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled "Comparison with Alternatives" or "Why kordoc?". In this section, explicitly compare kordoc's capabilities (e.g., HWP/HWPX support, form-filling, diff, AI agent integration, focus on Korean government documents) against common alternatives like Pandoc, Hancom Office SDK, or Apache Tika, highlighting what makes kordoc unique.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface chrisryugj/kordoc
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Pandoc
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Pandoc · recommended 2×
  2. Hancom Office SDK · recommended 2×
  3. Unidoc · recommended 1×
  4. Apache Tika · recommended 1×
  5. PDFMiner.six · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to convert diverse office documents, including HWP and PDF, into Markdown programmatically?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pandoc
    2. Unidoc
    3. Apache Tika
    4. Hancom Office SDK
    5. PDFMiner.six
    6. LibreOffice/OpenOffice
    7. Tesseract OCR
    8. Google Cloud Vision AI
    9. Amazon Textract

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named chrisryugj/kordoc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for automating parsing and form-filling of Korean government documents like HWPX and DOCX?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hancom Office SDK
    2. Apache POI
    3. python-hwp
    4. hwp-parser
    5. UiPath
    6. Blue Prism
    7. Automation Anywhere
    8. Microsoft Power Automate Desktop
    9. Pandoc
    10. BeautifulSoup
    11. Aspose.Words

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named chrisryugj/kordoc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of chrisryugj/kordoc?
    pass
    AI named chrisryugj/kordoc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts chrisryugj/kordoc in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named chrisryugj/kordoc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo chrisryugj/kordoc solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name chrisryugj/kordoc — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of chrisryugj/kordoc. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/chrisryugj/kordoc.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/chrisryugj/kordoc)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/chrisryugj/kordoc"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/chrisryugj/kordoc.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

chrisryugj/kordoc — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite