RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

robertpiosik/CodeWebChat

Default branch dev · commit f7cb1386 · scanned 6/26/2026, 5:53:13 PM

GitHub: 1,383 stars · 126 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface robertpiosik/CodeWebChat, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    vscode-extension, ai-chatbots, large-language-models, llm, generative-ai, free-ai, code-generation, ide-integration
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root of the repository with the text of a permissive open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://codeweb.chat

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface robertpiosik/CodeWebChat
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Chat
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 2×
  2. carlrobertoh/CodeGPT · recommended 1×
  3. Continue-team/continue · recommended 1×
  4. Tabnine Chat · recommended 1×
  5. Blackbox AI Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate various free AI chatbots directly into my VS Code editor?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. CodeGPT (carlrobertoh/CodeGPT)
    3. Continue (Continue-team/continue)
    4. Tabnine Chat
    5. Blackbox AI Chat
    6. CodiumAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named robertpiosik/CodeWebChat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow using multiple large language models for coding tasks within an IDE?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. VS Code
    3. GitHub Copilot Chat
    4. Codeium
    5. Tabnine
    6. Continue
    7. Ollama VS Code Extension
    8. JetBrains IDEs
    9. JetBrains AI Assistant
    10. Google Colab
    11. Gemini API
    12. Replit
    13. Ghostwriter

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named robertpiosik/CodeWebChat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of robertpiosik/CodeWebChat?
    pass
    AI did not name robertpiosik/CodeWebChat — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts robertpiosik/CodeWebChat in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named robertpiosik/CodeWebChat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo robertpiosik/CodeWebChat solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named robertpiosik/CodeWebChat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of robertpiosik/CodeWebChat. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/robertpiosik/CodeWebChat.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/robertpiosik/CodeWebChat)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/robertpiosik/CodeWebChat"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/robertpiosik/CodeWebChat.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

robertpiosik/CodeWebChat — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite