RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT

Default branch main · commit 8a7802ae · scanned 5/30/2026, 11:07:36 PM

GitHub: 1,340 stars · 189 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file with the MIT License content in the repository root.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository homepage to "https://github.com/WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT"

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IDA Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IDA Pro · recommended 2×
  2. NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra · recommended 2×
  3. IDA-GPT · recommended 1×
  4. Ghidra-GPT · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI's GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I leverage AI models to improve my binary reverse engineering workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. IDA-GPT
    3. Ghidra-GPT
    4. OpenAI's GPT-4
    5. Google's Gemini
    6. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    7. Ghidra-Ninja
    8. Binwalk (ReFirmLabs/binwalk)
    9. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    10. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    11. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    12. Panda (panda-re/panda)
    13. Radare2 (radareorg/radare2)
    14. Cutter (rizinorg/cutter)
    15. r2pipe (radareorg/r2pipe)
    16. OpenAI's GPT-3.5
    17. Anthropic's Claude
    18. MalwareBazaar
    19. VirusTotal

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools integrate large language models for vulnerability analysis in compiled executables?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. OpenAI API
    3. Google Gemini API
    4. Llama 3
    5. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    6. Binary Ninja
    7. angr (angr/angr)
    8. CodeQL (github/codeql)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WPeace-HcH/WPeGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite