RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

beichenzbc/Long-CLIP

Default branch main · commit 3966af9a · scanned 6/10/2026, 6:20:02 PM

GitHub: 900 stars · 47 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface beichenzbc/Long-CLIP, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Refine the README's opening sentence to emphasize 'long-text' capability

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository is the official implementation of Long-CLIP
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides the official implementation of Long-CLIP, a novel approach to extend CLIP's capabilities for processing and understanding long text inputs.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16962

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface beichenzbc/Long-CLIP
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  3. Cohere Summarize · recommended 1×
  4. text-davinci-003 · recommended 1×
  5. SpaCy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I process longer text inputs for existing text-to-image models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Cohere Summarize
    4. text-davinci-003
    5. SpaCy
    6. NLTK
    7. YAKE
    8. ControlNet
    9. Stable Diffusion
    10. Img2Img
    11. Midjourney Vary (Region)
    12. Sentence-BERT

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named beichenzbc/Long-CLIP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What solutions exist to enhance text-image retrieval accuracy for descriptions exceeding typical length limits?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CLIP
    2. BART
    3. T5
    4. ALBEF
    5. BLIP
    6. CoCa
    7. Flamingo
    8. ViLT

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named beichenzbc/Long-CLIP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of beichenzbc/Long-CLIP?
    pass
    AI named beichenzbc/Long-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts beichenzbc/Long-CLIP in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named beichenzbc/Long-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo beichenzbc/Long-CLIP solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named beichenzbc/Long-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of beichenzbc/Long-CLIP. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/beichenzbc/Long-CLIP.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/beichenzbc/Long-CLIP)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/beichenzbc/Long-CLIP"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/beichenzbc/Long-CLIP.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

beichenzbc/Long-CLIP — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite