RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank

Default branch main · commit a9f9fe3b · scanned 5/21/2026, 11:12:39 AM

GitHub: 1,267 stars · 96 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear introductory sentence to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with a date and project list, without a clear introductory statement.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this sentence to the very beginning of your README, ideally right after the main repository title: 'This repository provides a monthly updated list of the top 30 fastest-growing open-source projects on GitHub, ranked by their star growth.'
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    github, monthly, trending
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    github, monthly, trending, open-source, ranking, star-growth, popular-projects, developer-tools

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Trending
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Trending · recommended 2×
  2. Reddit · recommended 2×
  3. Dev.to · recommended 2×
  4. GitHut 2.0 · recommended 1×
  5. Oss Insight · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a list of the fastest-growing open-source projects on GitHub?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Trending
    2. GitHut 2.0
    3. Oss Insight
    4. Hacker News (YC)
    5. Reddit
    6. Openbase
    7. Dev.to

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How do I discover recently popular or trending open-source repositories each month?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Trending
    2. Hacker News
    3. Reddit
    4. Dev.to
    5. Product Hunt
    6. Open Source Daily
    7. Awesome Lists on GitHub

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank?
    pass
    AI named OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenGithubs/github-monthly-rank — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite